14 February 2008

Executive recommend closing Livesey Children's Museum

Tuesday night saw the Council's LibDem-Tory Executive Committee meet to agree their budget recommendations. Their coalition has an overall majority on the council and so their recommendations are likely to be agreed at Full Council Assembly next week when the budget is finalised.

A huge number of concerned residents and children came down to the Town Hall to protest against the proposals. It was fantastic to see the kids really getting into it chanting "Let the Livesey Live" - political engagement at such a young age.

Sadly the Executive weren't moved by this and still want to go forward with proposals to close the museum and save £140,000 a year. They claim they just can't afford to keep the museum going, but they were able to find an extra £2.5m to emply yet more management consultants to look at "modernising" the council (that's on top of the £11.4m spent on consultants this year). They are also proposing to increase council tax by 4%.

There are more details on Cllr Peter John's website about Labour's alternative proposals - I'll be voting for a budget which doesn't cut the Livesey Museum, doesn't hike up meals on wheels charges, doesn't make massive cuts in the community safety budget and increases council tax only by inflation as measured by the Consumer Price Index (ie around 2% - in line with public sector pay increases). To do this we'll be proposing cuts in the wasteful use of consultants, agency staff, publicity and promotions.

I know it's a tough financial year for Southwark, and most local authorities. We'd certainly like to get a lot more than a 2% increase in our grant from government and we're helping the council to lobby Ministers. But even so I still believe the council could produce a balanced budget that didn't involve drastic service cuts like closing the Museum. At the very least they could keep it open this year and give people the chance to investigate other sources of funding for the Museum.

On a slightly lighter note I was most entertained by Executive Member for Finance, and self-confessed ultra Thatcherite Tory Cllr Toby Eckersley, speculating that things would be better for Southwark Council under a "more favourable" (presumably he means Tory) government. I certainly don't recall his "dear lady" showing much generousity towards local government or any other sort of public services.

4 Comments:

At February 14, 2008 3:37 PM, Blogger CllrCorazzo said...

Fiona - keep up the good fight. Its remarkable what excuses Tories/Lib Dems use to justify cuts. I'm still reeling from a great Tory blunder in Northamptonshire: Pay £60,000 for a new automated gate barrier on council's car park, then rise the cost of a blue badge application by £15 to re-cooperate the cost. Now that is picking on the vulnerable!

 
At February 19, 2008 11:46 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hi Fiona,
was so interested on what you had to say about yourself ( i took the liberty of pasting part of it below)

!!!!I am a member of Southwark Labour Group, the largest party on Southwark Council, although the council is run by a LibDem-Tory coalition. !!!!

Wonder why the largest party does not run the borough?

I am sure i know why, but would love to hear from yourself and others why they think that control is held by Lib-Dem/Tory?

 
At February 20, 2008 8:17 AM, Blogger Fiona said...

Well anonymous, the glib answer is that there are 29 Lab cllrs, 27 LibDem, 6 Tories and 1 Green.

27 + 6 > 29

I'm happy to share my views on why there isn't a Lib-Lab grand coalition, or a Lab-Tory or a rainbow coalition, just as soon as you give up your anonymity.

 
At March 21, 2008 6:38 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

How's the Post Office campaign going?

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home