26 July 2006

Renewal Area Update July 06

Had a briefing from the Renewal Area team last night. I understand the team are readers of this blog - so Roger if I get anything wrong please use the comments to correct.

The project should see £14.5m spent on improving Nunhead & East Peckham over the next few years. Most of that will be spent on improving the most run down residential streets with some external works for all the houses on the street and grants for more major improvements (like double glazing, rewiring) for poor homeowners (mostly pensioners). The project will also see significant investment in Evelina Road, Queens Road and Meeting House Lane. More background in previous posts here and here.

(You could also check out my new categories links in the sidebar, with thanks to David Nicholson)

I've become rather frustrated with the project in recent months as progress has been much slower than I expected largely due to recruitment problems and also changes to government housing health & safety regulations. More info on this here, here and here.

Anyway, I feel a little more positive following last night's briefing. The team still only has six members of staff rather than 10, but the other 4 positions are all being advertised with the job descriptions for two key positions having been substantially rewritten. The team are hopeful this will now attract some high quality applicants.

There also seems to have been some progress on training staff in the new Housing Health & Safety Rating System. This is an essential element of assessing applications for home improvement grants and without trained staff none of the applications could be processed.

Other key issues

It looks likely that Astbury Road and Colls Road will be the first area to benefit from street works. There was a public meeting to discuss this in June and a further meeting which I hope will confirm this will be held in Sept or Oct. Further areas to benefit will be announced in due course, they hope the next area will be confirmed in Jan 07.

There was a (not very well advertised) meeting in June to discuss public involvement in the Evelina Road project. The project team also announced at that meeting that there was at least £500k earmarked for work on the street. It's really important that as many people as possible have there say on this as Nunhead Green and the shops on Evelina Road are the heart of Nunhead. It looks like the next discussion about this will be at the AGM of the Nunhead Community Forum on 30 September.

The Queens Road project will be one of the most complex. The team have great ambitions to make Queens Road world-class (although I'm not sure I really know what that means). There are already a great many projects going on around Queens Road - eg the demolition of the Wooddene Estate, rebuilding the shops around Queens Road Station, a neighbourhood renewal project on the Cossall & Brimmington Estates, Wandle Housing Association building new homes - so the first challenge will be to bring all the interested agencies and to try to get all these projects working together. I understand an event will be held in Sept/Oct.

And finally street lighting. This is the greatest source of frustration for me as installing £900k of street lighting was supposed to be the quick win - the piece of work the renewal team would deliver in the first year. We're over one year on and still no new street lights. The latest news is that the team now plan to spend about £1.5m over the next two years on new street lights. The detailed plans have been drafted and they hope they will be approved by the Director of Housing at the beginning of September.

Labels:

10 Comments:

At July 31, 2006 12:37 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

So can I just get this straight. The Nunhead regeneration zone actually only comprises in £500.000 being spent on Evelina road and all the rest 14.5 Million spent down in Peckham ? Colls Road & Astbury Road are 2mins away from the Old Kent Road - How on Earth is that in Nunhead ? As for a world class Queens road - How about a world class Nunhead Lane ? Once again all the money goes into Peckham. What about the rest of us or are we just getting on with life a little too quietly. It seems that the delay may be because it has been decided to shift the focus down to East Peckham - well Peckham. If you want to do the kids of Peckham a favour then try and get a swimming pool fixed quicker than over 2years !!

 
At July 31, 2006 2:31 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

So basically £500.000 is being spent in Nunhead and 14.5Mil is being spent in Peckham. Astbury Road and Colls Road are almost at the Old kent road nowhere near Nunhead. The Bellenden Road renewal was clearly focused around Bellenden Road. The so called Nunhead regeneration seems to really be about spending more money on Peckham. Surely that money should be allocated from Local government and not raised under false pretences. Why lottery funding to fix Peckham Pulse? Why a world class Queens Road how about a world class Nunhead lane? I think 15 Mill could easily be spent around the Nunhead ward there are loads off issues that need to be tackled. Or do we need crime and anti social behaviour to rise before we are rewarded. Once again Nunhead is overlooked - caught between Dulwich village/East Dulwich and the middle class hordes or Peckham and it's state draining chaos - NB sorry to everyone in Peckham who contributes positively to their community

 
At July 31, 2006 9:54 PM, Blogger Fiona said...

That's not it at all and I suggest you reread my post.

There is £14.5m to be spent across Nunhead & East Peckham. The majority of the money will be spent on improving housing conditions with the money targeted to low income homeowners - mostly pensioners (there are a lot of them in Nunhead).

A number of streets will be targeted for whole street works - new garden walls, fixing up brickwork etc for everyone with additional work like insulation, double glazing, done on a means tested basis.

The FIRST streets to be done are expected to be Astbury Rd and Colls Road. Nunhead streets such as Kirkwood Rd and Hollydale Rd are likely to follow.

The bulk of the money will go on this as the principle purpose of the project is to improve the quality of the housing stock in the area.

Some other things money will be spent on
- £1.5m on street lighting (targeted at areas with the worst lighting)
- some road safety measures
- improving shopping areas like Evelina Road, Queens Road and Meeting House Lane

Nothing has changed in the plans, this was always the proposal.

Re Nunhead Lane vs Queens Rd

My view is that Queens Road needs a huge amount of work, you're basically starting from scratch. Fortunately there are already a lot of projects going on so if the projects can be properly co-ordinated it should be possible to see some major changes without too much coming from the renewal area fund.

In Nunhead Lane/Evelina Road we already have the basics of a great high street, full of independent traders. They need to be helped along and allowed to florish. People want to keep the character and personally I'd be worried if the team were talking about massive change.

 
At August 02, 2006 10:21 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Interesting to read all these views,

I think that many of the residents of Nunhead have been hearing about the regeration zone for so long that it is becoming a bit of an urban myth. When work finally gets underway and we start to see improvemnts things will become clearer. As for the character of the the Lane yes we do have lots of independant shops - but a lot can and should be done to smarten the place up. A bit of gentrification would not go a miss - A nice bus shelter and maybe even a bus link directly into East Dulwich would be nice ? Do all roads have to lead through Peckham ?

 
At August 02, 2006 10:34 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hi Fiona,

It is interesting to read your Response to the last persons comments. When you say a means tested basis, you mean if you are signing on or can find an easy loophole to claim more money from the state then you can get your house improved ? - I think if this goverment did not leave it self so wide open to abuse then people would be less cynical - The older generations and people with genuine disabilities should of course be helped out - If only the state/local council could put in as much effort stopping the myriad of fraud that goes on than they do enforcing parking regs we may all be better off. Talking of parking any chance of Resident parking Zones in our area ?

 
At August 02, 2006 6:31 PM, Blogger Fiona said...

Hmm, all these anonymouses. Could you perhaps give yourselves names (invented if you like) to help me tell you apart?

Anonymous 10.21 I basically agree. We need to start seeing some action. Evelina Rd needs smartening up, promoting and most of all support from local residents (ie actually doing their shopping there rather than just saying they support them). A new bus shelter should be no problem, a new bus route won't be so easy...

Anonymous 10.34 - What makes you so sure there is a "myriad of fraud" going on?

I suspect we have rather different political outlooks on life, I sense you may be more of fan of the Daily Mail than the Guardian and that we are highly unlikely to agree on this issue.

Even if this were the large scale problem you think it is, surely such people would be more likely to be renting and claiming housing benefit than owning homes, in which case they wouldn't actually qualify for this scheme.

On residents parking I have to say I haven't found many people who are keen on the idea - but I know it is more of a problem on some roads than others. If you tell me which street you live on I can look into it.

 
At August 04, 2006 11:10 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hi all,

I was just reading your blog and it is very interesting. Lots of very usefull information. I just wanted to make a comment regarding anonymous 10.34! - I think that you may be some way of the mark to think that this is just a Readership issue. I am certainly not A DailyMail reader (I Hope!!!) and am most definately a Labour supporter but you would have to be very blinkered not to think that a lot of abuse does not go on in our area. Stupid example but here goes. I regulary use public transport too central London and am amazed to see the amount of people getting on the buses without using the oyster system. Some people will of course have valid tickets/travelcards but when you look at the numbers not using the Oyster system, around 50%, surely they can not all have valid tickets ?. The other day I was using the buses on the Kings Road in the Chelsea Borough and was amazed to see the number of inspectors on the buses. I discussed this issue with a couple of them and they responded that they were more likely to get accurate details from people in this area, therefore getting a payment via a fine than in Peckham. This is obviously not a scientific thing more an observation but if you regulary rode the buses in our area you really would have to see their point. My main worry about all this is... is our government actually beginning to believe it's own spin, there are serious abuses of the system going on, it is not being policed adequately, and more and more people are becoming less concerned about actually getting penalised. I know that this is not about the regeration Zone, but is is nice to express an opinion - Anyway great blog

 
At August 07, 2006 1:21 PM, Anonymous V G said...

Dear Fiona,

I have been reading your page for a few months now and would first of all like to thank you for the commitment you are showing to the improvement of the nunhead area. It is nice to see someone as dedicated as you in charge of our community!!!
I try to follow closely the nunhead renewal project progress as i find this area will greatly benefit from the regeneration....However my concern is that I haven t yet heard any mention of improving the area directly surrounding Nunhead railway station, which I beleive should be a priority in the improvement program... Most Nunhead residents do depend on this station and it must be said that Gibbon road needs a bit of an uplift to make it feel and look safer for all especially at night!!! I personally do not like to come out of the station or walk around there late or in the dark because it does not feel safe enough and unfortunately, I suspect many other females will feel the same as me !!!! would it not be a great idea to improve this vital part of Nunhead? I sincerely hope that the great renewal project has not ommitted this key area which is used by so many residents...

Please keep us informed on this matter ....

Thank you very much for all your help on this matter...

Kind regards....Nunhead resident

 
At August 07, 2006 11:32 PM, Blogger Fiona said...

Hi V G - Nunhead station and the area around it is a big priority for us.
Over the last couple of years we've backed bids to the council's Cleaner, Greener, Safer fund for new paving on Gibbon Rd and also for improvements to the entrance to the station (although that project hasn't been completed yet).

It's too early to say quite what the renewal area will bring, but at the least I am expecting Gibbon Rd and some other surrounding streets to be benefiting from new lighting - but I'm still waiting for confirmation of this.

BTW We are hoping to have a "Meet the Managers" session with SET on the station one morning in September. I'll put the details up once the date is confirmed.

Anon 11.10 (if you choose Other you can give yourself a name which makes it easier for me to reply). Maybe I'm jumping to unfair conclusions, but the fact is that local authorities (including Southwark) believe there is a greater problem with people failing to claim the benefits they are entitled to than with fraudulent claims.

Now I'm not much of one to praise the council (I am deputy leader of the opposition after all), but I am a fan of Southwark's Rightfully Yours campaign which led to a lot of people getting benefits which they were entitled to, but for various reasons were not claiming.

http://www.southwark.gov.uk/YourCouncil/CouncilTaxSection/rightfullyyours.html

From a local authority perspective it a good thing to increase take-up of benefits - they get paid by the government and it increases the council's rent and council tax income (thus helping us to keep those down). Of course we also need to work to reduce fraudulent claiming - but I just don't think it's anything like as widespread as the newspapers (esp the right-wing ones) and anon 10.34 would have us believe.

Bendy-buses - well, of course I always pay on my Oyster pre-pay. As you say a lot of people have season tickets, freedom passes or are under 16 don't need to touch their card to the reader. So it's hard to tell how many people are cheating, but I'd like to think most people are being honest. Obviously it's easier for people who want a free ride to take one on the bendies and I know even TfL's stats now show that fare dodging is higher on bendy buses that regular buses, but it's still not that high (GLA website not working at the moment, but I will find the stats and update this).

Yours with optimism

Fiona

 
At August 08, 2006 8:36 AM, Blogger Fiona said...

OK, GLA website working now so I have some Bendy Bus stats. The Tory Assembly Members hate the bendy buses so they are always asking Ken L about fare dodging on the bendies.

A few stats I have pulled out of his recent answers

- 87% of people already have a valid ticket before they board
- The latest estimate of fare dodging on bendy buses is 1.42%, costing approx £80k in June
- This is above average, the estimated total fare evasion rate (across all kinds of buses) is 1.12%
- Some bendy buses have a higher fare dodging rate than others, 12 = 1.61%, 436 = 1.73%, 25 = 1.81% whilst 149 = 1.05%, 521 = 0.79%, 507 = 0.61%
- However, some non-bendy buses also have well above average fare dodging, eg the 220 (Willesden Junction to Wandsworth) is 2.46%

So, bendy buses tend to have a higher fare evasion rate than non-bendies, but at less than 2% it is vastly lower than a lot of people seem to think it is.

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home